This morning Huffington Post’s Jonathan Cohn let the cat out of the bag, admitting that Obamacare was a redistribution scheme.
Touché, Mr. Weinstein.
Do you remember anyone — journalist or politician — divulging that information before the law was passed? How about when Obama was running for reelection? Of course not. The policy would have been as unpopular as the Cadillac Tax is now becoming.
It’s unclear when Jonathan Cohn learned Obamacare was a redistribution tool, but he admits he was pretty cozy with the Obamacare architects during the law’s creation, especially with Jonathan Gruber.
And remember when Jonathan Gruber told his guests that Obamacare was written in a “tortured way” so as to deceive voters, especially as regards its redistributive mechanisms?
In terms of risk-rated subsidies, if you had a law which said that healthy people are going to pay in — you made explicit that healthy people pay in and sick people get money? — it would not have passed. Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage.
Where was the American press on this nugget? Oh, that’s right. They weren’t interested in doing any investigative journalism on the law. That discovery was left to a financial advisor in Philly, an ordinary American who tried for well over a year to get the incurious press’ attention.
But Obamacare doesn’t only redistribute wealth. It also redistributes health.
In his January, 2015, Forbes piece titled “Is Obamacare Squeezing The Middle Class?” John Goodman explains:
Poor, long-uninsured patients are getting Medicaid through Obamacare and finally going to the doctor’s office for care. But middle-class patients are increasingly staying away…Gallup polling shows what has been happening over time: Even though more people are insured today than in quite some time, more people are putting off medical treatment because of cost than has been the case in the past eight years.”
Even The Los Angeles Times had to agree:
[T]he law hasn’t provided much relief to American workers either, according to a new study of employer-provided health benefits. Workers continue to be squeezed by rising insurance costs, eroding benefits and stagnant wages, the report from the nonprofit Commonwealth Fund found…”Workers are paying more but getting less protective benefits,” the report’s authors noted.
Last December, The New York Times’ survey showed the impact of health care expenses on Americans, concluding that:
Affording medical care is more of a hardship.
Out-of-pocket expenses have gone up.
It’s an axiom of economics (and common sense): when you increase the costs of a commodity, in this case health care, you reduce demand for it. And so middle-class Americans, hammered by rising expenses, are avoiding care, even if that doesn’t bode well for their long-term physical and emotional health.
This will be a story that plays out over coming years.
But the concepts of health and wealth redistribution should have been put before the American public, by lawmakers and journalists like Jonathan Cohn, before the law was passed — and then cemented by Obama’s reelection.
It’s likely, however, that they thought we were too stupid to understand how amazingly awesome Obamacare would be for us. Progressive elitists always think they know what’s best for the unwashed masses, and if they have to lie to get their policies through, they will. To Obama and his ilk, the ends always justify the means.